Britney Spears’ father Jamie denies claims that he bugged her bedroom when he headed conservatorship
Britney Spears‘ father Jamie Spears said he never planted a listening device in the singer’s bedroom.
Jamie, 69, issued a sworn declaration Wednesday to the Los Angeles Superior Court, Page Six reported, in regards to allegations made in a documentary aired on FX and Hulu last fall by a former security guard for the singer.
The guard, speaking in The New York Times Presents: Controlling Britney Spears, claimed Jamie had covertly recorded in excess of 180 hours of audio from the singer’s bedroom; and monitored Britney’s phone, including texts, calls and online history.
The latest: Britney Spears’ father Jamie Spears, 69, said in a sworn declaration Wednesday to the Los Angeles Superior Court that he never planted a listening device in the 40-year-old singer’s bedroom during the time he presided over her conservatorship
Jamie told the court, ‘I am informed of the allegation … that a listening device or “bug” was placed [in] her bedroom as surveillance during the conservatorship. This allegation is false.’
‘I never conducted or authorized any surveillance of Britney’s bedroom at any time, including during the conservatorship. I am not aware of any such surveillance having occurred.’
Jamie said that he ‘could and would testify’ to such ‘under penalty of perjury’ if he was called as a witness by the court.
Jamie did not address accusations he had monitored Britney’s phone.
Jamie, pictured in 2012, told the court he ‘never conducted or authorized any surveillance of Britney’s bedroom at any time, including during the conservatorship’
The 13-year long conservatorship over the pop star was ended last November
The New York Times reported that Jaime used ‘an intense surveillance apparatus’ in monitoring the pop star, and was shown emails, texts and clips from security official Alex Vlasov. Jamie had previously employed Vlasov’s firm Black Box Security as protection for his daughter amid the time of her conservatorship.
An attorney who once worked for Jaime, Vivian Lee Thoreen, issued a statement when the documentary was released that Jaime’s ‘actions were done with the knowledge and consent of Britney, her court-appointed attorney [Samuel D. Ingham III] and/or the court.’
Britney’s lawyer Mathew Rosengart earlier this year worked with Sherine Ebadi, an ex-FBI special agent, to probe the claims made by the documentary. In a declaration reviewed by Page Six, Ebadi said she’d ‘personally debriefed and interviewed’ Vlasov and found him to be ‘highly credible’ in his statements.
Ebadi said she came to the conclusion Jamie ‘engaged in and directed others to engage in unconscionable violations of [Britney’s] privacy and civil liberties.’
Britney’s lawyer Mathew Rosengart, pictured last year, worked with an ex FBI official who said Jamie ‘engaged in and directed others to engage in unconscionable violations of [Britney’s] privacy and civil liberties’
Jamie’s declaration to the court comes amid months of allegations between his lawyers and Britney’s that they were avoiding being deposed over the conservatorship, which was terminated in November of 2021 after more than 13 years.
Jamie’s attorney Alex Weingarten said in court docs he wanted to ask Britney about ‘unsupported claims’ the singer made about Jamie on social media.
Rosengart last fall requested Jamie take part in a deposition, and in May, filed a legal motion asking the court to compel Jamie to be deposed, noting that Jamie was initially asked to be deposed October 20, 2021 and ‘still has not appeared for his deposition’ after being offered eight open dates, People reported earlier this month, citing court docs.
Rosengart said that Jamie’s testimony is essential toward ‘pending matters,’ and that he is avoiding being deposed because it would exposed alleged rule violations in his overseeing of the conservatorship.
Source: | Dailymail.co.uk